Domestic, Early Childhood Education, English / Writing, K-12, Legislation, Opinion, Parents, Personalized Learning, Required - Written by Wired Academic on Friday, October 19, 2012 6:00 - 0 Comments
Annie Murphy Paul: Why 3rd Grade Is The Critical Academic Year
Photo Credit: Judy Baxter via Compfight
By Annie Murphy Paul, Columnist
Take a guess: What is the single most important year of an individual’s academic career? The answer isn’t junior year of high school, or senior year of college. It’s third grade.
What makes success in third grade so significant? It’s the year that students move from learning to read — decoding words using their knowledge of the alphabet — to reading to learn. The books children are expected to master are no longer simple primers but fact-filled texts on the solar system, Native Americans, the Civil War. Children who haven’t made the leap to fast, fluent reading begin at this moment to fall behind, and for most of them the gap will continue to grow. So third grade constitutes a critical transition — a “pivot point,” in the words of Donald J. Hernandez, a professor of sociology at CUNY–Hunter College. A study Hernandez conducted, released last year by the Annie E. Casey Foundation, found that third-graders who lack proficiency in reading are four times more likely to become high school dropouts.
Too often the story unfolds this way: struggles in third grade lead to the “fourth-grade slump,” as the reading-to-learn model comes to dominate instruction. While their more skilled classmates are amassing knowledge and learning new words from context, poor readers may begin to avoid reading out of frustration. A vicious cycle sets in: school assignments increasingly require background knowledge and familiarity with “book words” (literary, abstract and technical terms)— competencies that are themselves acquired through reading. Meanwhile, classes in science, social studies, history and even math come to rely more and more on textual analysis, so that struggling readers begin to fall behind in these subjects as well.
In operation here is what researchers call the “Matthew effect,” after the Bible verse found in the Gospel of Matthew: “For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.” In other words, the academically rich get richer and the poor get poorer, as small differences in learning ability grow into large ones. But the Matthew effect has an important upside: well-timed interventions can reverse its direction, turning a vicious cycle into a virtuous one.
Recognizing the importance of this juncture, some states have been taking a hard line: third-graders who aren’t reading at grade level don’t get promoted to fourth grade. “Mandatory retention” bills have already passed in Arizona, Florida, Indiana and Oklahoma, and are being considered in Colorado, Iowa, New Mexico and Tennessee. But many education researchers say holding kids back isn’t the answer. The ideal alternative: teachers and parents would collaborate on the creation of an individualized learning plan for each third-grader who needs help with reading — a plan that might involve specialized instruction, tutoring or summer school. Most important is taking action, researchers say, and not assuming that reading problems will work themselves out.
It might seem scary that a single school year can foretell so much of a student’s future. But maybe we should feel grateful instead — that research has given us a golden opportunity to both build on what has already been accomplished or turn kids’ academic lives around.
Campus Buzz
We welcome Tips & Pitches
Latest WA Original Features
-
“Instreamia” Shakes Loose Moss By Launching Spanish Language Mini-MOOC
-
Jörn Loviscach: A German Math Teaching Sensation Emerges On YouTube & Udacity
-
Open University Enters Battle Of The MOOCs, Launches “FutureLearn”
-
Alvaro Salas As A Case Study In Crowd-Funding An Ivy-League Education
-
Jonathan Mugan: How To Build A Free Computer Within A Computer For Your Child
Paul Glader, Managing Editor
@paulglader
Eleni Glader, Policy Editor
Elbert Chu, Innovation Editor
@elbertchu
Biagio Arobba, Web Developer
@barobba
Contributors:
Michael B. Horn
@michaelbhorn
Derek Reed
@derekreed
Annie Murphy Paul
@AnnieMurphyPaul
Frank Catalano
@FrankCatalano
Ryan Craig
@UniVenturesFund
Jonathan Mugan
@JMugan
Terry Heick
@TeachThought
Alison Anderson
@tedrosececi
Ravi Kumar
@ravinepal
The Pulitzer Prize winning investigation newsroom digs into for-profit education.
-
Most Viewed
- Inside Ashford University: A former staffer talks to WiredAcademic
- Infographic: A History Of Information Organization From Stone-Age To Google
- Davos: 12-Year-Old Pakistani Prodigy Girl Talks About Her Online Learning
- Open University Enters Battle Of The MOOCs, Launches "FutureLearn"
- Pearson Llc + Google Expands LMS Business With "OpenClass" System
-
MARKET INTRADAY SNAPSHOT
- Education & Tech Companies We Follow
APEI | 40.20 | -0.17 | -0.42% | ||
APOL | 19.01 | +0.33 | +1.77% | ||
AAPL | 460.16 | -6.43 | -1.38% | ||
BPI | 10.74 | -0.09 | -0.83% | ||
CAST | 0.11 | +0.01 | +10.00% | ||
CECO | 4.08 | -0.02 | -0.49% | ||
COCO | 2.40 | -0.02 | -0.83% | ||
CPLA | 32.03 | -0.41 | -1.26% | ||
DV | 30.69 | +0.36 | +1.19% | ||
EDMC | 4.03 | +0.07 | +1.77% | ||
ESI | 18.34 | +0.04 | +0.22% | ||
GOOG | 792.89 | +5.07 | +0.64% | ||
LINC | 6.20 | +0.06 | +0.98% | ||
LOPE | 25.03 | +0.36 | +1.46% | ||
PEDH | 0.45 | 0.00 | +0.00% | ||
PSO | 18.51 | -0.27 | -1.44% | ||
SABA | 8.61 | -0.16 | -1.82% | ||
SCHL | 30.87 | +0.46 | +1.51% | ||
STRA | 51.95 | -1.54 | -2.88% | ||
WPO | 414.41 | +5.35 | +1.31% |
Domestic, For-Profit, Gainful Employment, Infographics, Personalized Learning, Private, Public, Required, Universities & Colleges - Jan 31, 2013 6:09 - 0 Comments
Infographic: To Get A Degree Or Not To Get A Degree? Here Is An Answer
More In For-Profit
- Ryan Craig: American Clampdown Forcing Forlorn For-Profit Colleges To Look Abroad
- How For-Profit Colleges Major In Marketing & Fail Education
- Infographic: A Graphical Profile Of Today’s Online College Student
- Infographic: A Comparison Of For-Profits v. Non-Profit Online College Data
- Opinion: How “Shareholder Value” Is Destroying For-Profit, Career Colleges
Cost of Education Domestic Education Quality Ethics For-Profit Friend, Fraud, or Fishy Gainful Employment Graduation Rates Legislation Minorities Opinion Recruitment Regulatory Required Retention Rates Student Loans Universities & Colleges
MOOCs, Required, Technology - Feb 16, 2013 10:04 - 0 Comments
MOOC Monitor: Must Reads This Week
More In Technology
- Infographic: Rise of the MOOCs
- Smart Cities Part II: Why DC Is The Planetary Hub Of Online Learning
- Five Questions: Polling EdTech Startup UnderstoodIt’s Liam Kaufman
- Infographic: The Future of Higher Education
- Anne Collier: Study Shows eBooks Gaining Larger Share & Boosting Overall Reading Habits
Domestic K-12 Parents Reading / Literature Required Technology
Charter, Cost of Education, Domestic, Education Quality, Friend, Fraud, or Fishy, K-12, Minorities, Regulatory, Required - Feb 7, 2013 12:23 - 0 Comments
Should For-Profit Companies Manage K-12 Schools? A Skeptical Review
More In Friend, Fraud, or Fishy
- A Letter To Sen. Tom Harkin About For-Profit Charter Schools
- Ryan Craig: American Clampdown Forcing Forlorn For-Profit Colleges To Look Abroad
- Opinion: The Problem With Deceptive Degree Aggregators In The Search For Online Courses & Degrees
- How For-Profit Colleges Major In Marketing & Fail Education
- Infographic: A Comparison Of For-Profits v. Non-Profit Online College Data
Cost of Education Domestic For-Profit Friend, Fraud, or Fishy Graduation Rates Infographics Recruitment Required Universities & Colleges
Leave a Reply