Domestic, English / Writing, K-12, Math, Required, Technology - Written by Wired Academic on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 6:00 - 0 Comments
Online Standardized Tests: Revolutionary? Or Regressionary?
Photo Credit: Alberto G. via Compfight
By Sarah Garland, The Hechinger Report
New high-tech standardized tests are coming soon to schools across the country, but will these new tests really revolutionize how we measure whether children are learning? The designers of the new tests, which a majority of states plan to adopt in two years, are allowing a sneak peek at sample questions, so you can decide for yourself.
Two competing state coalitions have taken on the job of designing the new tests, the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium, and both have posted examples of what’s coming on their websites.
- Sample English/Language Arts question from Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium
- Sample Math question from Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium
- Sample question from third grade assessment from PARCC
- Sample math question from high school assessment from PARCC
In some questions, which the test designers have called “computer enhanced,” students will be asked to drag words or numbers across the screen, or to highlight phrases or sentences in a reading passage. In one example provided by Smarter Balanced to reporters during a conference call Monday, high school students can click on the screen to transfer water from a cube to a cylinder, which helps them solve a math problem about radius.
There will also be problems that require research and writing. Smarter Balanced officials gave an example of a multi-part question in which high school students are asked to imagine they are the chief of staff for a congresswoman. Before they start working on the test, their teacher is supposed to lead a classroom activity about nuclear power. The students are then asked to come up with a list of pros and cons about nuclear power. Finally, they must write up a presentation for the congresswoman to give at a press conference later that day.
“I can tell you, that’s real world,” said Barbara Kapinus, the director of English language arts and literacy for Smarter Balanced. “I’ve been in that situation.”
Many questions will continue to be multiple-choice, however. States have favored multiple-choice tests because they are cheaper to design and score, and since answer sheets can be run through a computer. Questions like the one about nuclear power are more expensive, because they will likely require a trained evaluator to score them.
One of the biggest concerns about the new tests has been how to finance them. The two coalitions designing the tests won grants from the federal government to pay for the beginning of the process, but this funding won’t cover ongoing expenses related to the tests, like paying people to score answer sheets and the cost of new computers and expanded bandwidth.
In the conference call with reporters, the director of Smarter Balanced, Joe Willhoft, said states that have signed on for the tests have agreed to pay annual administrative fees associated with the tests. “The lion’s share of those costs is bundled up in the human scoring,” he said.
This post was produced by The Hechinger Report, a non-profit journalism organization housed at Columbia University in New York.
Campus Buzz
We welcome Tips & Pitches
Latest WA Original Features
-
“Instreamia” Shakes Loose Moss By Launching Spanish Language Mini-MOOC
-
Jörn Loviscach: A German Math Teaching Sensation Emerges On YouTube & Udacity
-
Open University Enters Battle Of The MOOCs, Launches “FutureLearn”
-
Alvaro Salas As A Case Study In Crowd-Funding An Ivy-League Education
-
Jonathan Mugan: How To Build A Free Computer Within A Computer For Your Child
Paul Glader, Managing Editor
@paulglader
Eleni Glader, Policy Editor
Elbert Chu, Innovation Editor
@elbertchu
Biagio Arobba, Web Developer
@barobba
Contributors:
Michael B. Horn
@michaelbhorn
Derek Reed
@derekreed
Annie Murphy Paul
@AnnieMurphyPaul
Frank Catalano
@FrankCatalano
Ryan Craig
@UniVenturesFund
Jonathan Mugan
@JMugan
Terry Heick
@TeachThought
Alison Anderson
@tedrosececi
Ravi Kumar
@ravinepal
The Pulitzer Prize winning investigation newsroom digs into for-profit education.
-
Most Viewed
- Inside Ashford University: A former staffer talks to WiredAcademic
- Infographic: A History Of Information Organization From Stone-Age To Google
- Davos: 12-Year-Old Pakistani Prodigy Girl Talks About Her Online Learning
- Open University Enters Battle Of The MOOCs, Launches "FutureLearn"
- Pearson Llc + Google Expands LMS Business With "OpenClass" System
-
MARKET INTRADAY SNAPSHOT
- Education & Tech Companies We Follow
APEI | 40.20 | -0.17 | -0.42% | ||
APOL | 19.01 | +0.33 | +1.77% | ||
AAPL | 460.16 | -6.43 | -1.38% | ||
BPI | 10.74 | -0.09 | -0.83% | ||
CAST | 0.11 | +0.01 | +10.00% | ||
CECO | 4.08 | -0.02 | -0.49% | ||
COCO | 2.40 | -0.02 | -0.83% | ||
CPLA | 32.03 | -0.41 | -1.26% | ||
DV | 30.69 | +0.36 | +1.19% | ||
EDMC | 4.03 | +0.07 | +1.77% | ||
ESI | 18.34 | +0.04 | +0.22% | ||
GOOG | 792.89 | +5.07 | +0.64% | ||
LINC | 6.20 | +0.06 | +0.98% | ||
LOPE | 25.03 | +0.36 | +1.46% | ||
PEDH | 0.45 | 0.00 | +0.00% | ||
PSO | 18.51 | -0.27 | -1.44% | ||
SABA | 8.61 | -0.16 | -1.82% | ||
SCHL | 30.87 | +0.46 | +1.51% | ||
STRA | 51.95 | -1.54 | -2.88% | ||
WPO | 414.41 | +5.35 | +1.31% |
Domestic, For-Profit, Gainful Employment, Infographics, Personalized Learning, Private, Public, Required, Universities & Colleges - Jan 31, 2013 6:09 - 0 Comments
Infographic: To Get A Degree Or Not To Get A Degree? Here Is An Answer
More In For-Profit
- Ryan Craig: American Clampdown Forcing Forlorn For-Profit Colleges To Look Abroad
- How For-Profit Colleges Major In Marketing & Fail Education
- Infographic: A Graphical Profile Of Today’s Online College Student
- Infographic: A Comparison Of For-Profits v. Non-Profit Online College Data
- Opinion: How “Shareholder Value” Is Destroying For-Profit, Career Colleges
Cost of Education Domestic Education Quality Ethics For-Profit Friend, Fraud, or Fishy Gainful Employment Graduation Rates Legislation Minorities Opinion Recruitment Regulatory Required Retention Rates Student Loans Universities & Colleges
MOOCs, Required, Technology - Feb 16, 2013 10:04 - 0 Comments
MOOC Monitor: Must Reads This Week
More In Technology
- Infographic: Rise of the MOOCs
- Smart Cities Part II: Why DC Is The Planetary Hub Of Online Learning
- Five Questions: Polling EdTech Startup UnderstoodIt’s Liam Kaufman
- Infographic: The Future of Higher Education
- Anne Collier: Study Shows eBooks Gaining Larger Share & Boosting Overall Reading Habits
Domestic K-12 Parents Reading / Literature Required Technology
Charter, Cost of Education, Domestic, Education Quality, Friend, Fraud, or Fishy, K-12, Minorities, Regulatory, Required - Feb 7, 2013 12:23 - 0 Comments
Should For-Profit Companies Manage K-12 Schools? A Skeptical Review
More In Friend, Fraud, or Fishy
- A Letter To Sen. Tom Harkin About For-Profit Charter Schools
- Ryan Craig: American Clampdown Forcing Forlorn For-Profit Colleges To Look Abroad
- Opinion: The Problem With Deceptive Degree Aggregators In The Search For Online Courses & Degrees
- How For-Profit Colleges Major In Marketing & Fail Education
- Infographic: A Comparison Of For-Profits v. Non-Profit Online College Data
Cost of Education Domestic For-Profit Friend, Fraud, or Fishy Graduation Rates Infographics Recruitment Required Universities & Colleges
Leave a Reply